--On Monday, November 03, 2003 23:24:19 +0100 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman writes:
> I'll try and write the patch as you suggest. Here's a patch as you suggested:
Isn't there a way to write a test that actually triggers the bug we're trying to work around?
Not that I'm aware of (it was the following entry from SCO's fix list: 141. A bug was repaired in which an inlined function call, having been passed a null pointer, would trigger an internal C compiler error when this parameter was the target of a strcpy() or strncpy() call. fz528141
If you want to write a test, fine, but I think I've done my part which is report the bug to SCO, get a fix released, and then change our stuff to
detect it.
See the discussion referenced in the template file (7-8/AUG/2003 on -Hackers).
-- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature