Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I object to adding unnecessary complications like that.
> Shouldn't BEGIN and START TRANSACTION have the same mechanics? The
> changes to the code were the addition of only one line. The rest of the
> patch was docs.
My initial reaction was the same as Peter's, but after seeing the small
size of the patch I reconsidered. It seems to make sense that BEGIN
should be an exact synonym for START TRANSACTION.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
