Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I object to adding unnecessary complications like that.

> Shouldn't BEGIN and START TRANSACTION have the same mechanics?  The
> changes to the code were the addition of only one line.  The rest of the
> patch was docs.

My initial reaction was the same as Peter's, but after seeing the small
size of the patch I reconsidered.  It seems to make sense that BEGIN
should be an exact synonym for START TRANSACTION.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to