Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Removing sync() entirely requires very accurate fsync()'ing in the 
> background writer, the checkpointer and the backends. Basically none of 
> them can mark a block "clean" if he fails to fsync() the relation later! 
> This will be a mess to code.

Not really.  The O_SYNC solution for example would be trivial to code.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to