Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Removing sync() entirely requires very accurate fsync()'ing in the > background writer, the checkpointer and the backends. Basically none of > them can mark a block "clean" if he fails to fsync() the relation later! > This will be a mess to code.
Not really. The O_SYNC solution for example would be trivial to code. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly