Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This change is actually wrong (backwards), no? You want a true result > on equality.
Advertising
*sigh*, I'm an idiot. Thanks for catching my mistake! > Pretending that the result of strcmp is a bool is a type pun, and > one that can rise up to bite you. In the case at hand, strncmp is > allowed to return (say) 256 to indicate a nonzero result --- which > would be lost when the value is squeezed into a bool (char). See > the archives; we've had at least one bug of this ilk. Good point, and good to know. I just left the code as it previously was (but updated the comment), and applied the patch. Thanks again. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
