Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not objecting to your doing it, exactly, just suggesting that > there are better things to spend your time on.
Heh, probably true :-) I'll put this on the back-burner for now, and repost a complete patch later if I get around to it. > This I would object to, since it creates a risk of failure if anyone > is incautious enough to write a non-constant argument to > appendStringInfoString. Agreed. (Semi-OT note: allowing the user to extend the compiler to enforce rules like this is a cool idea: http://metacomp.stanford.edu/) -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
