Tom Lane wrote:
> * I changed the message wording to conform to the message style
>   guidelines.  I also made it complain about "costly sequential scans"
>   instead of "costly cross-type conversion", since ISTM that's what's
>   really at issue here.  I'm not completely wedded to that wording
>   though, if anyone feels the previous version was better.

So the issue wasn't that the conversion was costly, but that an index
couldn't be used to look up the primary key?

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to