Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Where was it posted anyway?
> > Found it:
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=200312010450.hB14ovH16330%40candle.pha.pa.us&rnum=8
> Thanks. The original patch is much older than I thought --- I was
> looking in the November/December part of the archives.
> > Personally, because frequently accessed duplicates appear more forward
> > in the duplicate index, I think the sorting is only valuable when
> > creating a new index.
> Yes, and that's what this does. Looking back, the original discussion
> got a little confused because the TODO item about "order duplicate index
> entries by tid" got brought into the mix. Actually this patch has
> nothing to do with that, because it only acts during btree creation not
> during index updates.
> On inspection I have no problem with the patch, only with the comments ;-)
> If you like I'll revise the comments and apply.
Great. Seems harmless and he showed good performance with it. I agree
the discussion got confused, and that is why I kept it in my mailbox to
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster