On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 23:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> MHO: you already spent more time on this than it deserves.  What you
> have sounds fine.

I applied the patch in basically its current form (I added some minimal
docs and fixed a few cosmetic details). I haven't implemented variants
of it for other datatypes, I may do that in the future. In any case, the
numeric-only implementation should be sufficient to conform to the


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to