Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 11:40:29 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> both using gcc?
> Mine is quite old:
> $ gcc --version
> 2.7.2.1
Man, that's ancient. What we're probably looking at here is a bug in
the #include search algorithm in that version of gcc. How do you feel
about upgrading? I thought I was being a troglodyte by still running
2.95.3 ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
