Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also changed all the pid variables to use pid_t.
Good, but ... > ! fscanf(pidf, "%u", &pid); this code will fail rather horribly if sizeof(pid_t) != sizeof(int). Even more to the point, I believe a standalone backend will put the negative of its PID into the file, and the revised code will fail to parse that at all. I think the safest code would be like long tmp; fscanf(pidf, "%ld", &tmp); if (tmp < 0) { tmp = -tmp; // do anything else needed for backend case } pid = (pid_t) tmp; regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]