On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:13:43 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This patch seems to do considerably more violence to the equations than >is needed to cover that oversight, though. The old behavior was >intentionally nonlinear in relsize; this is not.
The comment says "entirely ad-hoc" and I didn't see a particular reason why the lower half should be nonlinear in relsize while the upper half is linear in 1/relsize. So I opted for the "more esthetic" symmetrical function. :-) http://www.pivot.at/pg/costsize.jpg original http://www.pivot.at/pg/costsize_2.jpg nonlinear/linear http://www.pivot.at/pg/costsize_3a.jpg nonlinear http://www.pivot.at/pg/costsize_3b.jpg linear I don't have a strong opinion for either relsize or relsize^2. So please add " * relsize" or " / relsize" as appropriate before you apply (if you intend to apply). Servus Manfred ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
