Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It'd be good to have savepoints right now.  I'm not sure it'd be good to
> expose the nested transactions implementation if we are going to offer
> savepoints later, because it means we will have to keep nested
> transactions forever.

Nested transactions are *good*.  We should not hide them.

I don't object to offering spec-compatible savepoints, but the plain
fact of the matter is that that's a dumbed-down API.  We should not
feel constrained to offer only that.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to