Where are we on this?


Tom Lane wrote:
> Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Possibly the most correct solution is to assign the name "public" to the
> >> dummy schema that pg_dump creates internally when talking to a pre-7.3
> >> server.
> > I was considering that they might want to restore the dump into another 
> > schema and that would be easier with an unqualified name.  I don't really 
> > understand why the name needs to be fully qualified in the first place.
> Because it's entirely too likely that you'll drop the wrong thing if you
> issue an unqualified DROP.
>                       regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to