Where are we on this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote: > Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Possibly the most correct solution is to assign the name "public" to the > >> dummy schema that pg_dump creates internally when talking to a pre-7.3 > >> server. > > > I was considering that they might want to restore the dump into another > > schema and that would be easier with an unqualified name. I don't really > > understand why the name needs to be fully qualified in the first place. > > Because it's entirely too likely that you'll drop the wrong thing if you > issue an unqualified DROP. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
