Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > what's not (yet) > >> - Timelines...though I think they are useful, they may not be critical > > > I am not fond of the timeline idea, especially for 7.5. Let's get usage > > cases submitted first. I can imagine timelines as causing significant > > confusion during restore, which is the last thing we want to do. > > I think that judgment is exactly backward. *Not* having timelines is > what will cause serious and possibly fatal mistakes during restore: > people will hand the wrong xlog files to restore and the software will > be unable to recognize the inconsistency. > > We really need to get this right the first time.
I assume they could just restore from backup and try again. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
