Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > what's not (yet)
> >> - Timelines...though I think they are useful, they may not be critical
> > I am not fond of the timeline idea, especially for 7.5.  Let's get usage
> > cases submitted first.  I can imagine timelines as causing significant
> > confusion during restore, which is the last thing we want to do.
> I think that judgment is exactly backward.  *Not* having timelines is
> what will cause serious and possibly fatal mistakes during restore:
> people will hand the wrong xlog files to restore and the software will
> be unable to recognize the inconsistency.
> We really need to get this right the first time.

I assume they could just restore from backup and try again.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to