On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 07:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > glibc provides various routines (mb...) for handling Unicode. How many
> > of our supported platforms don't have these?
> Every one that doesn't use glibc. Don't bother proposing a glibc-only
> solution (and that's from someone who works for a glibc-only company;
> you don't even want to think about the push-back you'll get from other
No. that's not what I was proposing. My suggestion was to use these
routines if they are sufficiently widely implemented, and our own
routines where standard ones are not available.
The man page for mblen says
ISO/ANSI C, UNIX98"
Is glibc really the only C library to conform?
If using the mb... routines isn't feasible, IBM's ICU library
(http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/) is available under the X licence,
which is compatible with BSD as far as I can see. Besides character
conversion, ICU can also do collation in various locales and encodings.
My point is, we shouldn't be writing a new set of routines to do half a
job if there are already libraries available to do all of it.
Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E 1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA
"Be still before the LORD and wait patiently for him;
do not fret when men succeed in their ways, when they
carry out their wicked schemes."
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly