"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ISTM we should not ever queue any event for signal 0.

> That was my original intention, however Magnus thought it best just to
> let it be queued and subsequently ignored by the backend - thinking
> about it 15 minutes later I can't for the life of me think why that's
> any better...

Are there any error cases that we would miss detecting if it didn't go
that far?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to