Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.

If only psql uses the ico file right now, let's leave it in psql
directory.  We can always move it later.


Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> > > Evening committers,
> > > 
> > > Any ideas when Magnus' win32 version numbering patch is 
> > likely to get 
> > > applied?
> > 
> > Good question.  Last I saw it it was quite large.  Magnus, 
> > would you post a new version so we can look it over again.  I 
> > have no problem with the binary file you suggested.
> Not really, since I haven't changed anything. But I can send the same
> patch again. Last time I sent it there were no comments, so I knew of
> nothing further to change. If there are more changes wanted, just tell
> me what to change...
> The only remaining discussion I recall was possibly moving of the ico
> file to a different directory. Which I said I'd happily leave up to the
> committers :-) If you tell me where you want it I can of course create a
> new patch which uses those dirs... But I don't feel up to deciding about
> new directories myself ;-)
> //Magnus

Content-Description: win32ver_2.patch

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

Content-Description: pgsql.ico

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

Content-Description: win32ver.rc

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to