On Monday September 20 2004 6:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> That might work for you, but it's not portable.
> >
> > Do you consider pg_tm.tm_gmtoff reliable and portable from
> > pg_localtime(&now)?
> Yeah, in fact I was just adapting the patch to use that.

I have a 5-line check-last-filename patch, but it's so small you probably 
just want to add it yourself?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to