On Monday September 20 2004 6:02, Tom Lane wrote: > "Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> That might work for you, but it's not portable. > > > > Do you consider pg_tm.tm_gmtoff reliable and portable from > > pg_localtime(&now)? > > Yeah, in fact I was just adapting the patch to use that.
I have a 5-line check-last-filename patch, but it's so small you probably just want to add it yourself? Ed ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
