This has been saved for the 8.1 release:

        http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Sean Chittenden wrote:
> >> Is there any reason why the backend doesn't cast an unquoted integer 
> >> to
> >> a boolean value?
> >
> > Hidden cross-category typecasts are evil.  I'd accept this as an
> > explicit cast ('e' in pg_cast) but not automatic.
> >
> > Also, what about the other direction?  Providing a cast in only one
> > direction is pretty inconsistent.
> 
> test=> SELECT 1::BOOL, 0::BOOL, TRUE::INT4, FALSE::INT4;
>   bool | bool | int4 | int4
> ------+------+------+------
>   t    | f    |    1 |    0
> (1 row)
> 
> Okey doke, both directions are now provided and the cast has to be 
> explicit.  -sc
> 

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> 
> -- 
> Sean Chittenden

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to