"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch *replaces* the previous one. Contains the exact same changes,
> except it *also* contains the move of the backend parameter file to
> shared memory on win32.
I think it's way too late in the beta cycle for significant changes in
the fork mechanism ... especially if the gain is only 10% on something
that isn't a performance issue for properly written applications anyway.
Can I safely ignore this patch and use the prior one, or are there
additional bug fixes in this?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
