On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 23:08, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > as per SQL:2003 Annex E pp.1173-1175 "Incompatibilities with > > SQL:1999", specifically point 17, pp.1174-1175: > > > > "A number of additional <reserved word>s have been added to the > > language". > > I think you are confusing keywords.c with the SQL standard.
Hmmm... the difference was clear to me, since I edited one, but not the other. ;) If you are saying "we should not support the SQL standard with regard to the new reserved words added in SQL:2003", I would understand, but not agree. With you lies the power to apply, all some or none of the patch, as you choose. It was tedious enough to write the patch... -- Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
