Troels Arvin wrote:
> We have tried to use the official[1] short names:
> SQL-92
> SQL:1999
> SQL:2003

I could buy "SQL:1999", because then "SQL" would be a macro expanding to 
"ISO/IEC 9075".  But I don't see how SQL-92 fits in there.

> Note 1:
> has a
> section on this subject.

Note that this book is titled "SQL 1999 - Understanding Relational 
Language Components".  Apparently, they are not sure either.

Peter Eisentraut

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to