Troels Arvin wrote: > We have tried to use the official[1] short names: > SQL-92 > SQL:1999 > SQL:2003
I could buy "SQL:1999", because then "SQL" would be a macro expanding to "ISO/IEC 9075". But I don't see how SQL-92 fits in there. > Note 1: > http://books.elsevier.com/mk/default.asp?isbn=1558604561 has a > section on this subject. Note that this book is titled "SQL 1999 - Understanding Relational Language Components". Apparently, they are not sure either. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
