Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, that's wrong: if there is a pending SIGPIPE that belongs to the
> >> outer app, you'd clear it.
> > True, but I documented that in the patch.
> A documented bug is still a bug.  The entire point of this change is to
> not interfere with the behavior of the surrounding app, at least not
> more than we absolutely have to; and we do not have to clear SIGPIPEs
> that are certainly not ours.

I am working on a new version that doesn't have this problem.  Will post

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to