"Korea PostgreSQL Users' Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SSBmb3VuZCB0aGF0IGZ1bmN0aW9uIGdlbl9zYWx0KCkgaW4gY29udHJpYi9w
> Z2NyeXB0byBoYWQgYnVnIG9uIHdpbjMyLg0KDQpJIHBhdGNoZWQgY29udHJp
> Yi9wZ2NyeXB0by9yYW5kb20uYyBmaWxlLg0KDQo=

Unencoded text would be nicer to reply to ...

But anyway, why are you inserting an srandom() call?  That changes the
behavior on all platforms not just win32.  And I don't think the % 255
change is right either; doesn't that make it impossible to produce 255
as an output byte?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to