Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One difficulty was generating a new version of libpq.rc at the proper > > time. I added a prepdist rule just like *.def. I also added code so > > every time you do a 'make clean' or distclean it does a 'touch' on > > libpq.rc.in so libpq.rc is rebuilt on the next compile. That seemed > > like the cleanest solution. > > ... except CVS will not like it at all. Why don't you just remove the > libpq.rc file instead?
I am going to remove libpq.rc from CVS because it is now a derived file from libpq.rc.in. I don't remove via 'clean' because if someone wants to build VC or BCC and Win32 with the same tarball then once they do a 'clean' they can't do a VC or BCC compile anymore. Does that answer your question? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
