Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally, I'd just like it to be
> consistent, when I was looking at how to add the grammar for group
> ownership group names were identified in one place as 'ColId' and another
> as 'UserId', iirc.
Oh, I had forgotten we already had a UserId production. Yes, I agree
that if we're going to have that at all, it should be used consistently
in the places it applies to.
Given other discussion, it might be best to rename it to RoleId and use
that for both users and groups.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
