Patch applied.  Thanks.

I renamed aggregate_relation_size() to total_relation_size().  To me
'aggregate' was too closely associated with 'aggregates'.  If you have
improved wording please let me know.


Ed L. wrote:
> On Thursday February 3 2005 9:23, Ed L. wrote:
> > Neil, do you have a verdict on this patch?
> >
> > On Friday January 28 2005 10:30, Ed L. wrote:
> > > If the C code for the prior dbsize patch is not acceptable
> > > for whatever reason, here's a SQL-based patch to replace it.
> I submitted a dbsize patch on Jan 25, revised it twice per 
> concerns raised by Michael Paesold and Neil Conway ("indexes" 
> instead of "indices") and Andreas Pflug and Tom Lane (implement 
> in SQL instead of C) and resubmitted Jan 28.  I've not received 
> any further communication regarding the patch.  Please advise if 
> there are concerns.  I've attached the patch again, slightly 
> cleaned up, in case it has fallen through the cracks.
> Ed

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

  Bruce Momjian                        |               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to