Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Ah, the problem was introduced here:
Right, it was my fault. > The problem is that the PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL call was moved > below the printf 64-bit tests. This commited patch moves > PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL which is after we know AC_TRY_RUN works and > just before printf 64-bit args are tested. This patch breaks things in a different way: you should not have moved the AC_LIBOBJ(snprintf) step. Also you randomly placed the arg-control test between a chunk of code and the comment describing same. Corrected version committed. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]