Bruce Momjian <> writes:
> Ah, the problem was introduced here:

Right, it was my fault.

> The problem is that the PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL call was moved
> below the printf 64-bit tests.  This commited patch moves
> PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL which is after we know AC_TRY_RUN works and
> just before printf 64-bit args are tested.

This patch breaks things in a different way: you should not have moved
the AC_LIBOBJ(snprintf) step.  Also you randomly placed the arg-control
test between a chunk of code and the comment describing same.

Corrected version committed.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to