Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is > > enabled, > > I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved, > only complicate the configuration behavior even more.
I think this is analogous to checking for snprintf() support of 64-bit integers only if we previously found 64-bit integers to be supported. We don't need to include our own snprintf() if we don't need the extra features it provides. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
