Tom Lane wrote:

Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

I'm not sure what you mean. Earlier you rejected my bug-report on the iterator because you it was the callers responsability to deal with it (hence this patch). Are you now suggesting that we fix that bug instead?

Quite honestly, I dunno. I agree that there's something lacking in this
stack of behaviors, but I don't think any of the solutions suggested so
far actually fix it ...

Ok, in that case, please allow this patch to go through. It will not cause any harm and until a better solution is architected, it does solve my immediate problem.

Thomas Hallgren

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to