"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here is a second attempt, hope it's closer to what you expected.
Better --- patch applied with some minor editorialization. > I still left two #ifdefs in there, for the addition and subtraction of > timeval:s specifically. They could be made functions/macros too, just > not sure if it's worth it. Probably not. What bothers me more is the unconditional use of a static inline function; but IIRC we are only supporting gcc-based builds on Windows, so that probably isn't worth fixing either. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings