Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather
> >> than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER.
> > I hope not, but it would be easier to set like that and a lot easier to
> > code up that way.
> I don't like that either.  It seems highly unlikely that every table in
> a database would need the same fillfactor.  It should be a per-table
> attribute, maybe with a DB-wide default, much like we handle per-column
> statistics targets.

That is fine.  I just don't want to add the FILLFACTOR clause to several

  Bruce Momjian                        |               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to