Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch fixes a bug in the error message emitted by pg_restore on an 
> incorrect -F argument: write_msg() expects its first parameter to be a 
> "module name", not the format string. Patch applied to HEAD. Is this 
> worth backporting?

Certainly --- particularly if the error makes it dump core, as seems
likely (haven't tried it).

> BTW, is there a reason that pg_restore seems to accept 'f', 't', or 'c' 
> parameters to this argument, but the documentation only documents 't' 
> and 'c'?

I think the 'f' option is only intended for debugging purposes ...
Philip would know ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to