Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch fixes a bug in the error message emitted by pg_restore on an > incorrect -F argument: write_msg() expects its first parameter to be a > "module name", not the format string. Patch applied to HEAD. Is this > worth backporting?
Certainly --- particularly if the error makes it dump core, as seems likely (haven't tried it). > BTW, is there a reason that pg_restore seems to accept 'f', 't', or 'c' > parameters to this argument, but the documentation only documents 't' > and 'c'? I think the 'f' option is only intended for debugging purposes ... Philip would know ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend