John Hansen wrote: > Neil Conway wrote: > > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:56 AM > > To: Dennis Bjorklund > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] lastval() > > > > Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > > > Here is a small patch that implements a function lastval() > > that works > > > just like currval() except that it give the current value > > of the last > > > sequence used by nextval(). > > > > What do people think of this idea? (Tom seems opposed, I'm > > just wondering if there are other opinions out there.) > > I'm all for it. Even more so if the 'currval(void) called before > nextval(seq_name)' error message could be supressed by a GUC variable > and return 0 instead.
Why zero and no error? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [email protected] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
