Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I agree. That will also mean that buildfarm members will automatically start doing the checks (as long as they are set up to build the PLs), so it would be an extra bonus for me :-)
The only argument I can think of against it is that the buildfarm status page will then not distinguish core system check failures from PL check failures. If that doesn't bother you, we can make it so.
That's probably a good point. I was just being a little too lazy. Building an extra check step in is not very difficult - it will just take a little while for all the buildfarm emebers to catch up. But since we're still 6 weeks even from feature freeze that shouldn't matter too much. I'll get onto it.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
