Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What's the point of removing the distinction between check_ins and
>> check_upd functions?

> I talked about this in an earlier message to -hackers: check_upd was 
> actually unused (check_ins was used for both inserts and updates).

Hm, guess I missed (or forgot) that message.

> Hmm, I suppose -- if you prefer I can have check_ins called by the 
> INSERT trigger and check_upd called by the UPDATE trigger, which 
> probably makes more sense.

Yeah ... I thought it was doing that already.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to