Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> What's the point of removing the distinction between check_ins and >> check_upd functions?
> I talked about this in an earlier message to -hackers: check_upd was > actually unused (check_ins was used for both inserts and updates). Hm, guess I missed (or forgot) that message. > Hmm, I suppose -- if you prefer I can have check_ins called by the > INSERT trigger and check_upd called by the UPDATE trigger, which > probably makes more sense. Yeah ... I thought it was doing that already. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]