If you're busy, I can clean this up and apply it.

I wonder if it would be better to have lastval() return the last value returned by nextval() or setval() for the current session, regardless of any intervening DROP SEQUENCE commands. This would simplify the implementation (we can just store the int8 value produced by the last nextval() / setval() rather than a pointer to the sequence object itself), although it is debatable whether this behavior is more logical or not. Comments?


-Neil

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to