Yes please...

... That's exactly what I've been asking for.... 

> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Conway
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:18 PM
> To: Dennis Bjorklund
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] lastval()
> If you're busy, I can clean this up and apply it.
> I wonder if it would be better to have lastval() return the 
> last value returned by nextval() or setval() for the current 
> session, regardless of any intervening DROP SEQUENCE 
> commands. This would simplify the implementation (we can just 
> store the int8 value produced by the last
> nextval() / setval() rather than a pointer to the sequence 
> object itself), although it is debatable whether this 
> behavior is more logical or not. Comments?
> -Neil
> ---------------------------(end of 
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to