Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > The attached zip file (os2port.zip) contains an os2.diff file that has all
> > the patches for the os/2 port and a file os2newfiles.zip file that has the
> > additional files required for the port.
> > [ 130k diff snipped ]
> 
> We were willing to tolerate a port this invasive for Windows, but it's
> real hard to justify adding so much cruft for OS/2.

I agree with Tom on this.  The patch is 4k context diff, and the new
files are 30k.  It just seems too large for a port we are unlikely going
to be able to test or maintain.   I think it is like the Netware port
where we rely out port-specific folks to maintain a patch.  We can
mention the patch URL in the FAQ, and already have an OS/2 link there.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to