"Alon Goldshuv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A struct "bytebuffer" is used instead of a StringInfoData for storing the > line and attributes. A StringInfoData is actually really cool and useful, > but we don't really need it's formatting capabilities in COPY FROM (as far > as I know), and so the bytebuffer is more straightfoward and faster.
Is it really faster than appendStringInfoString or appendBinaryStringInfo? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org