On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 07:46:32PM +0200, Petr Jelínek wrote: > Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: > > >IIRC, people want the last one. We have more control if we can set it > >per user or per database. > > Like I said, guc variables _can_ be set per user or per database if you > use right context.
I don't think this approach is very user-friendly. I'd vote for the catalog approach, I think. > >Talking about pgstat, I think you can rely on > >it 'cause it can be disabled. Could you describe the design you > >intended to implement? > > I "can rely on it 'cause it can be disabled" - did you mean that I can't > rely on it ? > Well I am still not sure how I will implement it when I can't use > pgstat. I think that I will have to use similar aproach which makes me sad. Maybe you could make some checks against the shared array of PGPROCs (procarray.c), for the per-database limit at least. Not sure about per-user limit. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>) "[PostgreSQL] is a great group; in my opinion it is THE best open source development communities in existence anywhere." (Lamar Owen) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
