[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what the situation is in C89, or whatever the applicable
standard is?


[ *looks* ]

The text is the same in both versions:

http://dev.unicals.com/papers/c89-draft.html#3.3.2.2

"The order of evaluation of the function designator, the arguments, and
subexpressions within the arguments is unspecified, but there is a
sequence point before the actual call."

(On reading this more closely, I suppose you could make the argument that a function call that takes place in the argument list of another function call is a "subexpression within the [outer function's] arguments", so the order of evaluation prior to the call of the outer function would be undefined. But I don't think that's the right reading of the standard.)

-Neil

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
      match

Reply via email to