Hans-J|rgen Schvnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 64-bit XIDs seem to be an overkill - the only practical impact I can see 
> is an even larger tuple header (this can be an issue on large boxes too 
> - at least compared to Oracle).

I agreed, too. The changes of XIDs cannot be ignored because the overhead
will be 32bytes per tuple.

Avoiding overheads, can XIDs/CIDs be different bit length? For example,
can XIDs/CIDs be changed to 48/16-bit or 40/24-bit?

ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Cyber Space Laboratories

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to