Am Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2005 18:01 schrieb Simon Riggs: > This doc patch replaces all inappropriate references to SQL:1999 when it > is used as if it were the latest (and/or still valid) SQL standard. > > SQL:2003 is used in its place.
I don't necessarily consider this search and replace to be appropriate. All information for users looking for SQL:1999 compliance information is now lost. Also, phrases like "This is conforming to SQL:2003." give the wrong impression that it is not conforming to SQL:1999. I think it would be less confusing in these cases to simply write "This is conforming to the SQL standard." and then mention in the appendix that we consider SQL:2003 to be the baseline. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
