* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > However, on second thought I'm not sure that this is sensible anyway. > > Consider that every role is implicitly a member of PUBLIC --- so isn't > the above a creation of a circular membership loop, which is (for good > reason) forbidden by the spec?
Ah, yes, you're right. I won't claim to have considered that in the original working of the patch though. :) Stephen
Description: Digital signature