On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Neil Conway wrote: > Neil Conway wrote: > > Not at the moment. I believe we have agreed that it would be better to > > remove the concept of "exception variables" and just use strings, but I > > haven't implemented this yet. > > BTW, one minor annoyance I noticed: a builtin condition name can > actually map to multiple SQLSTATE values.
can you show sample, please? If we allow a builtin > condition name to be specified to RAISE, this means we'll actually need > to pass around a list of SQLSTATE values that are thrown by the RAISE, > rather than a single SQLSTATE. This seems pretty ugly, though -- > especially considering that only a handful of the builtin condition > names actually do map to multiple SQLSTATEs. Does anyone have a better > suggestion? > Exception variables can solve it, but its dead concept. We can have list of prohibited condition names and for its throw compile error condition name is ambigous Pavel > -Neil > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match