Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I have "worked over" your patch and I think it is ready for application.

I've made another pass over this and should be able to commit tomorrow
(I'm about to knock off for today, and ran out of time to test
pg_dumpall).  One thing I changed was that it didn't make sense to me
for CREATE DATABASE to copy the template database's datconnlimit.
We don't copy its datallowconn or datconfig, so why datconnlimit?

BTW I disagree with removing datallowconn; that is different from
datconnlimit = 0 because it is enforced even against superusers.
(Similar remarks apply for rolcanlogin vs rolconnlimit.)

                        regards, tom lane

Attachment: bin7rNzkZLnar.bin
Description: connlimit.patch.gz

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to