"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The source code is attached.
> gettimeofday(&start_t, NULL);
> if (method == 0)
> {
> for (i = 0; i < NBuffers; i++)
> k = array[i];
> }
> if (method == 1)
> {
> for (i = 0; i < NBuffers; i++)
> k = start + i*BLCKSZ;
> }
> if (method == 2)
> {
> for (i = 0; i < NBuffers; i++)
> k = start + (i<<13);
> }
> gettimeofday(&stop_t, NULL);
This is definitely going to tell us a lot more about the compiler's loop
strength reduction algorithms than it is going to tell about the time to
evaluate any one of these expressions in isolation. What's worse, the
compiler would be quite within its rights to detect that k isn't used
anywhere, and optimize the loop away completely.
What I would suggest is first to fill another array with some large
number of buffer numbers (randomly chosen from 1..N) and then time loops
of the form
for (i = 0; i < arraysize; i++)
{
bn = buffernumbers[i];
bufferlocs[i] = BufferGetBlock(bn);
}
for all three possible definitions of BufferGetBlock (where both arrays
are global variables, just to be sure the compiler doesn't think it can
discard the store). This should give some numbers worth trusting.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
