This has been saved for the 8.2 release:

        http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Matt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> I can attach a patch that supports [EXACT | NOEXACT].
> >> 
> >> Somehow, proposing two new reserved words instead of one doesn't seem
> >> very responsive to my gripe :-(.
> 
> > My intention was to introduce the idea that the current behavior should
> > be changed, and to then suggest a path that eventually eliminates all
> > the new reserved words.
> 
> Once you put 'em in, you can't ever really get rid of 'em :-( ... so I'd
> prefer to investigate a path that doesn't use that syntax in the first
> place.
> 
>                       regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to