On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> Global symbol "$x" requires explicit package name at (eval 3) line 1.
>
> If I'm reading the Perl source code correctly (pp_ctl.c), the number
> following "eval" comes from a variable named PL_evalseq that's
> incremented each time it appears in one of these messages. It looks
> like we'd have to munge the error message to get rid of that.
Advertising
Hmmm...tests suggest that we might be able to munge $@ in the
mk*safefunc functions. That is, instead of doing
return eval($stuff);
we might be able to do
my $retval = eval($stuff);
$@ =~ s/ \(eval \d+\) / /g if $@;
return $retval;
That would convert messages like
Global symbol "$x" requires explicit package name at (eval 3) line 1.
into
Global symbol "$x" requires explicit package name at line 1.
Is that what you're looking for? So far I've done only simple tests
in standalone embedded Perl programs, so I don't know if this approach
would work in PL/Perl or have unintended effects.
--
Michael Fuhr
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
